On the plus side, I never have to meet him. He is his own crime and punishment. One day he’ll be dead, hopefully sooner if his consumption preferences have anything to do with it. Personally I say hit the crack pipe and eat huge steaks waved over a bic lighter for 15 seconds. Go boy, go. Show us all how right you are.

Before you set your opinion in concrete, let me off you one ineluctable reality. Your thinking is finite. Economic and population growth comparisons assumes a supposed infinite supply of healthful populations. As you remain solidified in your population control theories, I would invite you to remember that the future is neither deducible nor rational, even your own liberal-leaning hypothetical futurist decline due to humankind overload. Assuming infinite population growth, you suffer the same consequences of Chad’s original argument. Please make sure your own theories are solidified in stone before calling out others based on infinite theory. Just think Igor, what if tomorrow, a virus spread throughout humanity killing half the population of the world? Would this calm you finite theories? Or assume that nothing happens tomorrow, therefore allowing the human race to over populate uncontrollably. Would this make your argument any less severe? Both possibilities result in a pure 50/50 Brownian movement; therefore, both becoming subject to the Zero Sum game. Your point of view, Igor, is no more likely than Chad’s point of view, unless of course the definition of God is also the same definition of Igor. As it stands, Igor, your infinite liberal-leaning, overpopulation, wisdom-laden ideas are no more worthwhile than a Muslim supporting black president.

Before you set your opinion in concrete, let me offer you one ineluctable reality. The earth is finite. Economic and population growth assumes infinite resources. Which one of these two facts do you think is likely to be wrong?